Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — m3/d to imp qt/wk
Convert Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per days = 6,159.138952 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-5 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks
Cubic Meter per Days and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = cubic meter per days × 6159.13895237
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0000115740740741 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per days-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 6159.13895237.
Simple example
1 m3/d × 6159.138952 = 6,159.138952 imp qt/wk
1 cubic meter per days = 6,159.138952 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 m3/d × 6159.138952 = 369,548.3371 imp qt/wk
60 cubic meter per days = 369,548.3371 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/d | 615.9138952 imp qt/wk |
| 1 m3/d | 6,159.138952 imp qt/wk |
| 10 m3/d | 61,591.38952 imp qt/wk |
| 60 m3/d | 369,548.3371 imp qt/wk |
| 100 m3/d | 615,913.8952 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 m3/d | 6,159,138.952 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Days
1 imp qt/wk × 0.0001623603571 = 0.0001623604 m3/d
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0001623604 cubic meter per days.
cubic meter per days = imperial quart per weeks × 0.000162360357143
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 cubic meter per days?
1 cubic meter per days equals 6,159.138952 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per days to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the cubic meter per days value by 6159.138952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to cubic meter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0001623604 cubic meter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per days?
Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per days to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per days and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6159.138952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.