Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Minutes Converter — m3/fn to m3/min
Convert Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) to Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per fortnight = 0.0000496032 cubic meter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-7 / 0.01666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Minutes
Cubic Meter per Fortnight and Cubic Meter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per minutes = cubic meters per fortnight × 0.0000496031746032
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-7 base units, and 1 cubic meter per minutes equals 0.0166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per fortnight-to-cubic meter per minutes factor of 0.0000496031746032.
Simple example
1 m3/fn × 0.0000496031746 = 0.0000496032 m3/min
1 cubic meter per fortnight = 0.0000496032 cubic meter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 m3/fn × 0.0000496031746 = 0.0029761905 m3/min
60 cubic meters per fortnight = 0.0029761905 cubic meter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) | Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/fn | 0.0000049603 m3/min |
| 1 m3/fn | 0.0000496032 m3/min |
| 10 m3/fn | 0.0004960317 m3/min |
| 60 m3/fn | 0.0029761905 m3/min |
| 100 m3/fn | 0.0049603175 m3/min |
| 1,000 m3/fn | 0.0496031746 m3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Fortnight
0.0000496032 m3/min × 20160 = 1.000000512 m3/fn
0.0000496032 cubic meter per minutes = 1.000000512 cubic meters per fortnight.
cubic meters per fortnight = cubic meter per minutes × 20160
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per minutes are in 1 cubic meter per fortnight?
1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 0.0000496032 cubic meter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per fortnight to cubic meter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic meter per fortnight value by 0.0000496031746. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per minutes back to cubic meter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per minutes equals 20,160 cubic meters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per fortnight?
Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per minutes?
Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per fortnight to cubic meter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per fortnight and cubic meter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0000496031746 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.