Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — m3/fn to mL/ms
Convert Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per fortnight = 0.0008267196 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-7 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond
Cubic Meter per Fortnight and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = cubic meters per fortnight × 0.00082671957672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-7 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per fortnight-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 0.00082671957672.
Simple example
1 m3/fn × 0.0008267195767 = 0.0008267196 mL/ms
1 cubic meter per fortnight = 0.0008267196 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 m3/fn × 0.0008267195767 = 0.0496031746 mL/ms
60 cubic meters per fortnight = 0.0496031746 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/fn | 0.000082672 mL/ms |
| 1 m3/fn | 0.0008267196 mL/ms |
| 10 m3/fn | 0.0082671958 mL/ms |
| 60 m3/fn | 0.0496031746 mL/ms |
| 100 m3/fn | 0.0826719577 mL/ms |
| 1,000 m3/fn | 0.8267195767 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Fortnight
0.0008267196 mL/ms × 1209.6 = 1.000000028 m3/fn
0.0008267196 milliliters per millisecond = 1.000000028 cubic meters per fortnight.
cubic meters per fortnight = milliliters per millisecond × 1209.6
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic meter per fortnight?
1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 0.0008267196 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per fortnight to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic meter per fortnight value by 0.0008267195767. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to cubic meter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 1,209.6 cubic meters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per fortnight?
Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per fortnight to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per fortnight and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0008267195767 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.