Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — m3/fn to imp qt/h
Convert Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per fortnight = 2.618681527 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-7 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Hours
Cubic Meter per Fortnight and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = cubic meters per fortnight × 2.61868152737
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-7 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per fortnight-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 2.61868152737.
Simple example
1 m3/fn × 2.618681527 = 2.618681527 imp qt/h
1 cubic meter per fortnight = 2.618681527 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 m3/fn × 2.618681527 = 157.1208916 imp qt/h
60 cubic meters per fortnight = 157.1208916 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/fn | 0.2618681527 imp qt/h |
| 1 m3/fn | 2.618681527 imp qt/h |
| 10 m3/fn | 26.18681527 imp qt/h |
| 60 m3/fn | 157.1208916 imp qt/h |
| 100 m3/fn | 261.8681527 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 m3/fn | 2,618.681527 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Fortnight
2.618681527 imp qt/h × 0.38187156 = 0.9999999999 m3/fn
2.618681527 imperial quart per hours = 0.9999999999 cubic meters per fortnight.
cubic meters per fortnight = imperial quart per hours × 0.38187156
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 cubic meter per fortnight?
1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 2.618681527 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per fortnight to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the cubic meter per fortnight value by 2.618681527. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to cubic meter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.38187156 cubic meters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per fortnight?
Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per fortnight to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per fortnight and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.618681527 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.