Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond Converter — m3/fn to qt/ms
Convert Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) to Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per fortnight = 8.735848e-7 quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-7 / 0.946352946.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meters per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond
Cubic Meter per Fortnight and Quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quarts per millisecond = cubic meters per fortnight × 8.735848e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-7 base units, and 1 quart per millisecond equals 0.946352946 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per fortnight-to-quart per millisecond factor of 8.735848e-7.
Simple example
1 m3/fn × 8.735848e-7 = 8.735848e-7 qt/ms
1 cubic meter per fortnight = 8.735848e-7 quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 m3/fn × 8.735848e-7 = 0.0000524151 qt/ms
60 cubic meters per fortnight = 0.0000524151 quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) | Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/fn | 8.735848e-8 qt/ms |
| 1 m3/fn | 8.735848e-7 qt/ms |
| 10 m3/fn | 0.0000087358 qt/ms |
| 60 m3/fn | 0.0000524151 qt/ms |
| 100 m3/fn | 0.0000873585 qt/ms |
| 1,000 m3/fn | 0.0008735848 qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Fortnight
8.735848e-7 qt/ms × 1144708.523 = 0.9999999665 m3/fn
8.735848e-7 quarts per millisecond = 0.9999999665 cubic meters per fortnight.
cubic meters per fortnight = quarts per millisecond × 1144708.52348
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quarts per millisecond are in 1 cubic meter per fortnight?
1 cubic meter per fortnight equals 8.735848e-7 quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per fortnight to quart per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic meter per fortnight value by 8.735848e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per millisecond back to cubic meter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per millisecond equals 1,144,708.523 cubic meters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per fortnight?
Cubic Meter per Fortnight (m3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per millisecond?
Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per fortnight to quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per fortnight and quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.735848e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.