Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meters per Millisecond to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — m3/ms to bu/ms
Convert Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per millisecond = 28.37759326 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meters per Millisecond to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1000 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meters per Millisecond to Bushels per Millisecond
Cubic Meter per Millisecond and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = cubic meters per millisecond × 28.3775932584
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per millisecond-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 28.3775932584.
Simple example
1 m3/ms × 28.37759326 = 28.37759326 bu/ms
1 cubic meter per millisecond = 28.37759326 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 m3/ms × 28.37759326 = 1,702.655596 bu/ms
60 cubic meters per millisecond = 1,702.655596 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/ms | 2.837759326 bu/ms |
| 1 m3/ms | 28.37759326 bu/ms |
| 10 m3/ms | 283.7759326 bu/ms |
| 60 m3/ms | 1,702.655596 bu/ms |
| 100 m3/ms | 2,837.759326 bu/ms |
| 1,000 m3/ms | 28,377.59326 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Millisecond
28.37759326 bu/ms × 0.03523907017 = 1 m3/ms
28.37759326 bushels per millisecond = 1 cubic meters per millisecond.
cubic meters per millisecond = bushels per millisecond × 0.0352390701669
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 cubic meter per millisecond?
1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 28.37759326 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic meter per millisecond value by 28.37759326. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to cubic meter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 0.0352390702 cubic meters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per millisecond to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per millisecond and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 28.37759326 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.