Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — m3/min to imp qt/wk
Convert Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per minutes = 8,869,160.091 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01666666667 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks
Cubic Meter per Minutes and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = cubic meter per minutes × 8869160.09142
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per minutes equals 0.0166666666667 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per minutes-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 8869160.09142.
Simple example
1 m3/min × 8869160.091 = 8,869,160.091 imp qt/wk
1 cubic meter per minutes = 8,869,160.091 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 m3/min × 8869160.091 = 532,149,605.5 imp qt/wk
60 cubic meter per minutes = 532,149,605.5 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/min | 886,916.0091 imp qt/wk |
| 1 m3/min | 8,869,160.091 imp qt/wk |
| 10 m3/min | 88,691,600.91 imp qt/wk |
| 60 m3/min | 532,149,605.5 imp qt/wk |
| 100 m3/min | 886,916,009.1 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 m3/min | 8,869,160,091 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Minutes
1 imp qt/wk × 1.127502e-7 = 1.127502e-7 m3/min
1 imperial quart per weeks = 1.127502e-7 cubic meter per minutes.
cubic meter per minutes = imperial quart per weeks × 1.127502e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 cubic meter per minutes?
1 cubic meter per minutes equals 8,869,160.091 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per minutes to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the cubic meter per minutes value by 8869160.091. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to cubic meter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.127502e-7 cubic meter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per minutes?
Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per minutes to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per minutes and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8869160.091 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.