Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — m3/wk to cm3/s
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 1.65343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 1.65343915344.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 1.653439153 = 1.653439153 cm3/s
1 cubic meter per weeks = 1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 1.653439153 = 99.20634921 cm3/s
60 cubic meter per weeks = 99.20634921 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.1653439153 cm3/s |
| 1 m3/wk | 1.653439153 cm3/s |
| 10 m3/wk | 16.53439153 cm3/s |
| 60 m3/wk | 99.20634921 cm3/s |
| 100 m3/wk | 165.3439153 cm3/s |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 1,653.439153 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks
1.653439153 cm3/s × 0.6048 = 0.9999999997 m3/wk
1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.9999999997 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 0.6048
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 1.653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.6048 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.