Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — m3/wk to ft3/ms
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 5.839065e-8 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = cubic meter per weeks × 5.839065e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 5.839065e-8.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 5.839065e-8 = 5.839065e-8 ft3/ms
1 cubic meter per weeks = 5.839065e-8 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 5.839065e-8 = 0.0000035034 ft3/ms
60 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0000035034 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 5.839065e-9 ft3/ms |
| 1 m3/wk | 5.839065e-8 ft3/ms |
| 10 m3/wk | 5.839065e-7 ft3/ms |
| 60 m3/wk | 0.0000035034 ft3/ms |
| 100 m3/wk | 0.0000058391 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 0.0000583907 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Weeks
5.839065e-8 ft3/ms × 17126028.82 = 0.9999999547 m3/wk
5.839065e-8 cubic feet per millisecond = 0.9999999547 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = cubic feet per millisecond × 17126028.8188
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 5.839065e-8 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 5.839065e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 17,126,028.82 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.839065e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.