Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric cup per Seconds Converter — m3/wk to metric cup/s
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0066137566 metric cup per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric cup per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.00025.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric cup per Seconds
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Metric cup per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric cup per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 0.00661375661376
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 metric cup per seconds equals 0.00025 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-metric cup per seconds factor of 0.00661375661376.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 0.006613756614 = 0.0066137566 metric cup/s
1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0066137566 metric cup per seconds.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 0.006613756614 = 0.3968253968 metric cup/s
60 cubic meter per weeks = 0.3968253968 metric cup per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.0006613757 metric cup/s |
| 1 m3/wk | 0.0066137566 metric cup/s |
| 10 m3/wk | 0.0661375661 metric cup/s |
| 60 m3/wk | 0.3968253968 metric cup/s |
| 100 m3/wk | 0.6613756614 metric cup/s |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 6.613756614 metric cup/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric cup per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks
0.0066137566 metric cup/s × 151.2 = 0.9999999979 m3/wk
0.0066137566 metric cup per seconds = 0.9999999979 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = metric cup per seconds × 151.2
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric cup per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric cup per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0066137566 metric cup per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to metric cup per seconds?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 0.006613756614. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric cup per seconds back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric cup per seconds equals 151.2 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric cup per seconds?
Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to metric cup per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and metric cup per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.006613756614 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.