Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Decaliter per Minutes Converter — m3/wk to daL/min
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0099206349 decaliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Decaliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.0001666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Decaliter per Minutes
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Decaliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
decaliter per minutes = cubic meter per weeks × 0.00992063492063
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 decaliter per minutes equals 0.000166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-decaliter per minutes factor of 0.00992063492063.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 0.009920634921 = 0.0099206349 daL/min
1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0099206349 decaliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 0.009920634921 = 0.5952380952 daL/min
60 cubic meter per weeks = 0.5952380952 decaliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.0009920635 daL/min |
| 1 m3/wk | 0.0099206349 daL/min |
| 10 m3/wk | 0.0992063492 daL/min |
| 60 m3/wk | 0.5952380952 daL/min |
| 100 m3/wk | 0.9920634921 daL/min |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 9.920634921 daL/min |
Reverse conversion: Decaliter per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Weeks
0.0099206349 daL/min × 100.8 = 0.9999999979 m3/wk
0.0099206349 decaliter per minutes = 0.9999999979 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = decaliter per minutes × 100.8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Decaliter per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many decaliter per minutes are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0099206349 decaliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to decaliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 0.009920634921. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert decaliter per minutes back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 decaliter per minutes equals 100.8 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a decaliter per minutes?
Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to decaliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and decaliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.009920634921 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.