Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds Converter — m3/wk to fl oz/s
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0559094291 fluid ounce per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 2.95735296e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Fluid ounce per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 0.0559094290705
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-fluid ounce per seconds factor of 0.0559094290705.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 0.05590942907 = 0.0559094291 fl oz/s
1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0559094291 fluid ounce per seconds.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 0.05590942907 = 3.354565744 fl oz/s
60 cubic meter per weeks = 3.354565744 fluid ounce per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.0055909429 fl oz/s |
| 1 m3/wk | 0.0559094291 fl oz/s |
| 10 m3/wk | 0.5590942907 fl oz/s |
| 60 m3/wk | 3.354565744 fl oz/s |
| 100 m3/wk | 5.590942907 fl oz/s |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 55.90942907 fl oz/s |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks
0.0559094291 fl oz/s × 17.88607068 = 1.000000001 m3/wk
0.0559094291 fluid ounce per seconds = 1.000000001 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = fluid ounce per seconds × 17.8860706794
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0559094291 fluid ounce per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to fluid ounce per seconds?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 0.05590942907. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 17.88607068 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to fluid ounce per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and fluid ounce per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.05590942907 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.