Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds Converter — m3/wk to imp gal/s
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0003637058 imperial gallon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.00454609.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Imperial gallon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallon per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 0.00036370576769
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 0.00454609 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-imperial gallon per seconds factor of 0.00036370576769.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 0.0003637057677 = 0.0003637058 imp gal/s
1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0003637058 imperial gallon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 0.0003637057677 = 0.0218223461 imp gal/s
60 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0218223461 imperial gallon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.0000363706 imp gal/s |
| 1 m3/wk | 0.0003637058 imp gal/s |
| 10 m3/wk | 0.0036370577 imp gal/s |
| 60 m3/wk | 0.0218223461 imp gal/s |
| 100 m3/wk | 0.0363705768 imp gal/s |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 0.3637057677 imp gal/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks
0.0003637058 imp gal/s × 2749.475232 = 1.000000089 m3/wk
0.0003637058 imperial gallon per seconds = 1.000000089 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = imperial gallon per seconds × 2749.475232
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallon per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0003637058 imperial gallon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to imperial gallon per seconds?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 0.0003637057677. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per seconds back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 2,749.475232 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per seconds?
Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to imperial gallon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and imperial gallon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0003637057677 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.