Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Kiloliters per Millisecond Converter — m3/wk to kL/ms
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Kiloliter per Millisecond (kL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 1.653439e-9 kiloliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Kiloliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Kiloliters per Millisecond
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Kiloliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
kiloliters per millisecond = cubic meter per weeks × 1.653439e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 kiloliter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-kiloliter per millisecond factor of 1.653439e-9.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 1.653439e-9 = 1.653439e-9 kL/ms
1 cubic meter per weeks = 1.653439e-9 kiloliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 1.653439e-9 = 9.920635e-8 kL/ms
60 cubic meter per weeks = 9.920635e-8 kiloliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Kiloliter per Millisecond (kL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 1.653439e-10 kL/ms |
| 1 m3/wk | 1.653439e-9 kL/ms |
| 10 m3/wk | 1.653439e-8 kL/ms |
| 60 m3/wk | 9.920635e-8 kL/ms |
| 100 m3/wk | 1.653439e-7 kL/ms |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 0.0000016534 kL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Kiloliter per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Weeks
1.653439e-9 kL/ms × 604800000 = 0.9999999072 m3/wk
1.653439e-9 kiloliters per millisecond = 0.9999999072 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = kiloliters per millisecond × 604800000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Kiloliter per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Millisecond (kL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many kiloliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 1.653439e-9 kiloliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to kiloliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 1.653439e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert kiloliter per millisecond back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 kiloliter per millisecond equals 604,800,000 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a kiloliter per millisecond?
Kiloliter per Millisecond (kL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to kiloliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and kiloliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.653439e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.