Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds Converter — m3/wk to imp pt/s
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0029096461 imperial pint per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.00056826125.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Imperial pint per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 0.00290964614152
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 0.00056826125 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-imperial pint per seconds factor of 0.00290964614152.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 0.002909646142 = 0.0029096461 imp pt/s
1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0029096461 imperial pint per seconds.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 0.002909646142 = 0.1745787685 imp pt/s
60 cubic meter per weeks = 0.1745787685 imperial pint per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.0002909646 imp pt/s |
| 1 m3/wk | 0.0029096461 imp pt/s |
| 10 m3/wk | 0.0290964614 imp pt/s |
| 60 m3/wk | 0.1745787685 imp pt/s |
| 100 m3/wk | 0.2909646142 imp pt/s |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 2.909646142 imp pt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks
0.0029096461 imp pt/s × 343.684404 = 0.9999999857 m3/wk
0.0029096461 imperial pint per seconds = 0.9999999857 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = imperial pint per seconds × 343.684404
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0029096461 imperial pint per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to imperial pint per seconds?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 0.002909646142. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per seconds back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 343.684404 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per seconds?
Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to imperial pint per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and imperial pint per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.002909646142 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.