Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Days Converter — m3/wk to imp qt/d
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 125.6967133 imperial quart per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 1.31541956e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Days
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per days = cubic meter per weeks × 125.696713314
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 imperial quart per days equals 1.31542e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-imperial quart per days factor of 125.696713314.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 125.6967133 = 125.6967133 imp qt/d
1 cubic meter per weeks = 125.6967133 imperial quart per days.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 125.6967133 = 7,541.802799 imp qt/d
60 cubic meter per weeks = 7,541.802799 imperial quart per days.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 12.56967133 imp qt/d |
| 1 m3/wk | 125.6967133 imp qt/d |
| 10 m3/wk | 1,256.967133 imp qt/d |
| 60 m3/wk | 7,541.802799 imp qt/d |
| 100 m3/wk | 12,569.67133 imp qt/d |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 125,696.7133 imp qt/d |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Meter per Weeks
125.6967133 imp qt/d × 0.0079556575 = 0.9999999999 m3/wk
125.6967133 imperial quart per days = 0.9999999999 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = imperial quart per days × 0.0079556575
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Days to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per days are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 125.6967133 imperial quart per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to imperial quart per days?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 125.6967133. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per days back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per days equals 0.0079556575 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per days?
Imperial quart per Days (imp qt/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to imperial quart per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and imperial quart per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 125.6967133 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.