Cubic Meter per Weeks to Quart per Seconds Converter — m3/wk to qt/s

Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Quart per Seconds (qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0017471697 quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Cubic Meter per Weeks to Quart per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0017471697 quart per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.000946352946.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Quart per Seconds

Cubic Meter per Weeks and Quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

quart per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 0.00174716965845

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 quart per seconds equals 0.000946352946 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-quart per seconds factor of 0.00174716965845.

Simple example

1 m3/wk × 0.001747169658 = 0.0017471697 qt/s

1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0017471697 quart per seconds.

Real-world example

60 m3/wk × 0.001747169658 = 0.1048301795 qt/s

60 cubic meter per weeks = 0.1048301795 quart per seconds.

Conversion table

Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)Quart per Seconds (qt/s)
0.1 m3/wk0.000174717 qt/s
1 m3/wk0.0017471697 qt/s
10 m3/wk0.0174716966 qt/s
60 m3/wk0.1048301795 qt/s
100 m3/wk0.1747169658 qt/s
1,000 m3/wk1.747169658 qt/s

Reverse conversion: Quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks

0.0017471697 qt/s × 572.3542617 = 1.000000024 m3/wk

0.0017471697 quart per seconds = 1.000000024 cubic meter per weeks.

cubic meter per weeks = quart per seconds × 572.354261741

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks.

Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Quart per Seconds (qt/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many quart per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?

1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0017471697 quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to quart per seconds?

Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 0.001747169658. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert quart per seconds back to cubic meter per weeks?

Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per seconds equals 572.3542617 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a cubic meter per weeks?

Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a quart per seconds?

Quart per Seconds (qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the cubic meter per weeks to quart per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001747169658 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.