Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours Converter — m3/wk to metric tsp/h
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 1,190.47619 metric teaspoon per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 1.38888889e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per hours = cubic meter per weeks × 1190.47619048
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 1.388889e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per hours factor of 1190.47619048.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 1190.47619 = 1,190.47619 metric tsp/h
1 cubic meter per weeks = 1,190.47619 metric teaspoon per hours.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 1190.47619 = 71,428.57143 metric tsp/h
60 cubic meter per weeks = 71,428.57143 metric teaspoon per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 119.047619 metric tsp/h |
| 1 m3/wk | 1,190.47619 metric tsp/h |
| 10 m3/wk | 11,904.7619 metric tsp/h |
| 60 m3/wk | 71,428.57143 metric tsp/h |
| 100 m3/wk | 119,047.619 metric tsp/h |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 1,190,476.19 metric tsp/h |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Hours to Cubic Meter per Weeks
1 metric tsp/h × 0.00084 = 0.00084 m3/wk
1 metric teaspoon per hours = 0.00084 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = metric teaspoon per hours × 0.00084
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Hours to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per hours are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 1,190.47619 metric teaspoon per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 1190.47619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per hours back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 0.00084 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per hours?
Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and metric teaspoon per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1190.47619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.