Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Cubic inch per Seconds Converter — mm3/d to in3/s
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) to Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per days = 7.062933e-10 cubic inch per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Cubic inch per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-14 / 1.6387064e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Days to Cubic inch per Seconds
Cubic Millimeter per Days and Cubic inch per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per seconds = cubic millimeter per days × 7.062933e-10
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, and 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 0.000016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per days-to-cubic inch per seconds factor of 7.062933e-10.
Simple example
1 mm3/d × 7.062933e-10 = 7.062933e-10 in3/s
1 cubic millimeter per days = 7.062933e-10 cubic inch per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mm3/d × 7.062933e-10 = 4.23776e-8 in3/s
60 cubic millimeter per days = 4.23776e-8 cubic inch per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) | Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/d | 7.062933e-11 in3/s |
| 1 mm3/d | 7.062933e-10 in3/s |
| 10 mm3/d | 7.062933e-9 in3/s |
| 60 mm3/d | 4.23776e-8 in3/s |
| 100 mm3/d | 7.062933e-8 in3/s |
| 1,000 mm3/d | 7.062933e-7 in3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Days
7.062933e-10 in3/s × 1415842330 = 0.9999999513 mm3/d
7.062933e-10 cubic inch per seconds = 0.9999999513 cubic millimeter per days.
cubic millimeter per days = cubic inch per seconds × 1415842329.6
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per seconds are in 1 cubic millimeter per days?
1 cubic millimeter per days equals 7.062933e-10 cubic inch per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days to cubic inch per seconds?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per days value by 7.062933e-10. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per seconds back to cubic millimeter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 1,415,842,330 cubic millimeter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per seconds?
Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per days to cubic inch per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per days and cubic inch per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 7.062933e-10 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.