Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Cubic inch per Weeks Converter — mm3/d to in3/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) to Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per days = 0.0004271662 cubic inch per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Cubic inch per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-14 / 2.70950132e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Days to Cubic inch per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Days and Cubic inch per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per weeks = cubic millimeter per days × 0.000427166208663
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, and 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2.709501e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per days-to-cubic inch per weeks factor of 0.000427166208663.
Simple example
1 mm3/d × 0.0004271662087 = 0.0004271662 in3/wk
1 cubic millimeter per days = 0.0004271662 cubic inch per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/d × 0.0004271662087 = 0.0256299725 in3/wk
60 cubic millimeter per days = 0.0256299725 cubic inch per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) | Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/d | 0.0000427166 in3/wk |
| 1 mm3/d | 0.0004271662 in3/wk |
| 10 mm3/d | 0.0042716621 in3/wk |
| 60 mm3/d | 0.0256299725 in3/wk |
| 100 mm3/d | 0.0427166209 in3/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/d | 0.4271662087 in3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days
0.0004271662 in3/wk × 2341.009143 = 0.9999999797 mm3/d
0.0004271662 cubic inch per weeks = 0.9999999797 cubic millimeter per days.
cubic millimeter per days = cubic inch per weeks × 2341.00914286
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per days?
1 cubic millimeter per days equals 0.0004271662 cubic inch per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days to cubic inch per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per days value by 0.0004271662087. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per weeks back to cubic millimeter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2,341.009143 cubic millimeter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per weeks?
Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per days to cubic inch per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per days and cubic inch per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0004271662087 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.