Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Gallons per Fortnight Converter — mm3/d to gal/fn
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) to Gallon per Fortnight (gal/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per days = 0.0000036984 gallon per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Gallons per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-14 / 3.12947403e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Days to Gallons per Fortnight
Cubic Millimeter per Days and Gallon per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
gallons per fortnight = cubic millimeter per days × 0.00000369840873301
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, and 1 gallon per fortnight equals 3.129474e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per days-to-gallon per fortnight factor of 0.00000369840873301.
Simple example
1 mm3/d × 0.000003698408733 = 0.0000036984 gal/fn
1 cubic millimeter per days = 0.0000036984 gallons per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mm3/d × 0.000003698408733 = 0.0002219045 gal/fn
60 cubic millimeter per days = 0.0002219045 gallons per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) | Gallon per Fortnight (gal/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/d | 3.698409e-7 gal/fn |
| 1 mm3/d | 0.0000036984 gal/fn |
| 10 mm3/d | 0.0000369841 gal/fn |
| 60 mm3/d | 0.0002219045 gal/fn |
| 100 mm3/d | 0.0003698409 gal/fn |
| 1,000 mm3/d | 0.0036984087 gal/fn |
Reverse conversion: Gallon per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Days
0.0000036984 gal/fn × 270386.556 = 0.9999976387 mm3/d
0.0000036984 gallons per fortnight = 0.9999976387 cubic millimeter per days.
cubic millimeter per days = gallons per fortnight × 270386.556
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Gallon per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Gallon per Fortnight (gal/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many gallons per fortnight are in 1 cubic millimeter per days?
1 cubic millimeter per days equals 0.0000036984 gallons per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days to gallon per fortnight?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per days value by 0.000003698408733. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert gallon per fortnight back to cubic millimeter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 gallon per fortnight equals 270,386.556 cubic millimeter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a gallon per fortnight?
Gallon per Fortnight (gal/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per days to gallon per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per days and gallon per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003698408733 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.