Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — mm3/d to mL/ms
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per days = 1.157407e-11 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Days to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-14 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Days to Milliliters per Millisecond
Cubic Millimeter per Days and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = cubic millimeter per days × 1.157407e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per days-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 1.157407e-11.
Simple example
1 mm3/d × 1.157407e-11 = 1.157407e-11 mL/ms
1 cubic millimeter per days = 1.157407e-11 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mm3/d × 1.157407e-11 = 6.944444e-10 mL/ms
60 cubic millimeter per days = 6.944444e-10 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/d | 1.157407e-12 mL/ms |
| 1 mm3/d | 1.157407e-11 mL/ms |
| 10 mm3/d | 1.157407e-10 mL/ms |
| 60 mm3/d | 6.944444e-10 mL/ms |
| 100 mm3/d | 1.157407e-9 mL/ms |
| 1,000 mm3/d | 1.157407e-8 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Days
1.157407e-11 mL/ms × 86400000000 = 0.999999648 mm3/d
1.157407e-11 milliliters per millisecond = 0.999999648 cubic millimeter per days.
cubic millimeter per days = milliliters per millisecond × 86400000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic millimeter per days?
1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-11 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per days value by 1.157407e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to cubic millimeter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 86,400,000,000 cubic millimeter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per days to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per days and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.157407e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.