Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight to Quart per Hours Converter — mm3/fn to qt/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) to Quart per Hours (qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per fortnight = 3.144905e-9 quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight to Quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-16 / 2.62875818e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight to Quart per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight and Quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quart per hours = cubic millimeters per fortnight × 3.144905e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-16 base units, and 1 quart per hours equals 2.628758e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per fortnight-to-quart per hours factor of 3.144905e-9.
Simple example
1 mm3/fn × 3.144905e-9 = 3.144905e-9 qt/h
1 cubic millimeter per fortnight = 3.144905e-9 quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/fn × 3.144905e-9 = 1.886943e-7 qt/h
60 cubic millimeters per fortnight = 1.886943e-7 quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) | Quart per Hours (qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/fn | 3.144905e-10 qt/h |
| 1 mm3/fn | 3.144905e-9 qt/h |
| 10 mm3/fn | 3.144905e-8 qt/h |
| 60 mm3/fn | 1.886943e-7 qt/h |
| 100 mm3/fn | 3.144905e-7 qt/h |
| 1,000 mm3/fn | 0.0000031449 qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight
3.144905e-9 qt/h × 317974589.9 = 0.9999998775 mm3/fn
3.144905e-9 quart per hours = 0.9999998775 cubic millimeters per fortnight.
cubic millimeters per fortnight = quart per hours × 317974589.856
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Hours (qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quart per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight?
1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 3.144905e-9 quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per fortnight to quart per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per fortnight value by 3.144905e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per hours back to cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per hours equals 317,974,589.9 cubic millimeters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per hours?
Quart per Hours (qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per fortnight to quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per fortnight and quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.144905e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.