Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — mm3/h to mL/s
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per hours = 2.777778e-7 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-13 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds
Cubic Millimeter per Hours and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = cubic millimeter per hours × 2.777778e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per hours-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 2.777778e-7.
Simple example
1 mm3/h × 2.777778e-7 = 2.777778e-7 mL/s
1 cubic millimeter per hours = 2.777778e-7 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mm3/h × 2.777778e-7 = 0.0000166667 mL/s
60 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.0000166667 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/h | 2.777778e-8 mL/s |
| 1 mm3/h | 2.777778e-7 mL/s |
| 10 mm3/h | 0.0000027778 mL/s |
| 60 mm3/h | 0.0000166667 mL/s |
| 100 mm3/h | 0.0000277778 mL/s |
| 1,000 mm3/h | 0.0002777778 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
2.777778e-7 mL/s × 3600000 = 1.00000008 mm3/h
2.777778e-7 milliliter per seconds = 1.00000008 cubic millimeter per hours.
cubic millimeter per hours = milliliter per seconds × 3600000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 cubic millimeter per hours?
1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-7 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per hours value by 2.777778e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to cubic millimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 3,600,000 cubic millimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per hours to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per hours and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.777778e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.