Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond to Cup per Hours Converter — mm3/ms to cup/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) to Cup per Hours (cup/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per millisecond = 15.21631022 cup per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond to Cup per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 6.57189546e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond to Cup per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond and Cup per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cup per hours = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 15.2163102158
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 cup per hours equals 6.571895e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per millisecond-to-cup per hours factor of 15.2163102158.
Simple example
1 mm3/ms × 15.21631022 = 15.21631022 cup/h
1 cubic millimeter per millisecond = 15.21631022 cup per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/ms × 15.21631022 = 912.9786129 cup/h
60 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 912.9786129 cup per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) | Cup per Hours (cup/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/ms | 1.521631022 cup/h |
| 1 mm3/ms | 15.21631022 cup/h |
| 10 mm3/ms | 152.1631022 cup/h |
| 60 mm3/ms | 912.9786129 cup/h |
| 100 mm3/ms | 1,521.631022 cup/h |
| 1,000 mm3/ms | 15,216.31022 cup/h |
Reverse conversion: Cup per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond
15.21631022 cup/h × 0.06571895458 = 1 mm3/ms
15.21631022 cup per hours = 1 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
cubic millimeters per millisecond = cup per hours × 0.0657189545833
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cup per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cup per Hours (cup/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cup per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond?
1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 15.21631022 cup per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond to cup per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per millisecond value by 15.21631022. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cup per hours back to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cup per hours equals 0.0657189546 cubic millimeters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cup per hours?
Cup per Hours (cup/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per millisecond to cup per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per millisecond and cup per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 15.21631022 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.