Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Years Converter — mm3/min to bu/yr
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Bushel per Years (bu/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0149251725 bushel per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 1.11668168e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Years
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Bushel per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per years = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0149251724722
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 bushel per years equals 1.116682e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-bushel per years factor of 0.0149251724722.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.01492517247 = 0.0149251725 bu/yr
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0149251725 bushel per years.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.01492517247 = 0.8955103483 bu/yr
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.8955103483 bushel per years.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Bushel per Years (bu/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.0014925172 bu/yr |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.0149251725 bu/yr |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.1492517247 bu/yr |
| 60 mm3/min | 0.8955103483 bu/yr |
| 100 mm3/min | 1.492517247 bu/yr |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 14.92517247 bu/yr |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.0149251725 bu/yr × 67.00090078 = 1.000000002 mm3/min
0.0149251725 bushel per years = 1.000000002 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = bushel per years × 67.0009007845
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Years (bu/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per years are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0149251725 bushel per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to bushel per years?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.01492517247. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per years back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per years equals 67.00090078 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per years?
Bushel per Years (bu/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to bushel per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and bushel per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01492517247 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.