Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Weeks Converter — mm3/min to m3/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.00001008 cubic meter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 1.65343915e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Cubic Meter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per weeks = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.00001008
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-cubic meter per weeks factor of 0.00001008.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.00001008 = 0.00001008 m3/wk
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.00001008 cubic meter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.00001008 = 0.0006048 m3/wk
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0006048 cubic meter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.000001008 m3/wk |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.00001008 m3/wk |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.0001008 m3/wk |
| 60 mm3/min | 0.0006048 m3/wk |
| 100 mm3/min | 0.001008 m3/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 0.01008 m3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.00001008 m3/wk × 99206.34921 = 1 mm3/min
0.00001008 cubic meter per weeks = 1 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = cubic meter per weeks × 99206.3492063
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.00001008 cubic meter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to cubic meter per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.00001008. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 99,206.34921 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to cubic meter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and cubic meter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001008 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.