Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic yard per Years Converter — mm3/min to yd3/yr
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0006879156 cubic yard per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic yard per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 2.4227779e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic yard per Years
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Cubic yard per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per years = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.000687915581868
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 cubic yard per years equals 2.422778e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-cubic yard per years factor of 0.000687915581868.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.0006879155819 = 0.0006879156 yd3/yr
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0006879156 cubic yard per years.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.0006879155819 = 0.0412749349 yd3/yr
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0412749349 cubic yard per years.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.0000687916 yd3/yr |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.0006879156 yd3/yr |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.0068791558 yd3/yr |
| 60 mm3/min | 0.0412749349 yd3/yr |
| 100 mm3/min | 0.0687915582 yd3/yr |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 0.6879155819 yd3/yr |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.0006879156 yd3/yr × 1453.666738 = 1.000000026 mm3/min
0.0006879156 cubic yard per years = 1.000000026 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = cubic yard per years × 1453.66673813
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per years are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0006879156 cubic yard per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to cubic yard per years?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.0006879155819. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per years back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per years equals 1,453.666738 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per years?
Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to cubic yard per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and cubic yard per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0006879155819 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.