Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cup per Weeks Converter — mm3/min to cup/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Cup per Weeks (cup/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0426056686 cup per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cup per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 3.91184253e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cup per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Cup per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cup per weeks = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0426056686043
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 cup per weeks equals 3.911843e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-cup per weeks factor of 0.0426056686043.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.0426056686 = 0.0426056686 cup/wk
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0426056686 cup per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.0426056686 = 2.556340116 cup/wk
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 2.556340116 cup per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Cup per Weeks (cup/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.0042605669 cup/wk |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.0426056686 cup/wk |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.426056686 cup/wk |
| 60 mm3/min | 2.556340116 cup/wk |
| 100 mm3/min | 4.26056686 cup/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 42.6056686 cup/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.0426056686 cup/wk × 23.47105521 = 0.9999999999 mm3/min
0.0426056686 cup per weeks = 0.9999999999 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = cup per weeks × 23.4710552083
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cup per Weeks (cup/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cup per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0426056686 cup per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to cup per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.0426056686. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cup per weeks back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cup per weeks equals 23.47105521 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cup per weeks?
Cup per Weeks (cup/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to cup per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and cup per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0426056686 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.