Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Liters per Fortnight Converter — mm3/min to L/fn
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.02016 liter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Liters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 8.26719577e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Liters per Fortnight
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Liter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
liters per fortnight = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.02016
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 liter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-liter per fortnight factor of 0.02016.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.02016 = 0.02016 L/fn
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.02016 liters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.02016 = 1.2096 L/fn
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 1.2096 liters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.002016 L/fn |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.02016 L/fn |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.2016 L/fn |
| 60 mm3/min | 1.2096 L/fn |
| 100 mm3/min | 2.016 L/fn |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 20.16 L/fn |
Reverse conversion: Liter per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.02016 L/fn × 49.6031746 = 1 mm3/min
0.02016 liters per fortnight = 1 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = liters per fortnight × 49.6031746032
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Liter per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Liter per Fortnight (L/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many liters per fortnight are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.02016 liters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to liter per fortnight?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.02016. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert liter per fortnight back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 liter per fortnight equals 49.6031746 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a liter per fortnight?
Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to liter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and liter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.02016 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.