Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Seconds Converter — mm3/min to uL/s
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0166666667 microliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Seconds
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Microliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per seconds = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0166666666667
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 microliter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-microliter per seconds factor of 0.0166666666667.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.01666666667 = 0.0166666667 uL/s
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0166666667 microliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.01666666667 = 1 uL/s
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 1 microliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.0016666667 uL/s |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.0166666667 uL/s |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.1666666667 uL/s |
| 60 mm3/min | 1 uL/s |
| 100 mm3/min | 1.666666667 uL/s |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 16.66666667 uL/s |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.0166666667 uL/s × 60 = 1.000000002 mm3/min
0.0166666667 microliter per seconds = 1.000000002 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = microliter per seconds × 60
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per seconds are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0166666667 microliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to microliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.01666666667. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per seconds back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per seconds equals 60 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per seconds?
Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to microliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and microliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01666666667 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.