Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — mm3/min to mL/s
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000166667 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Milliliter per Seconds
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0000166666666667
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.0000166666666667.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.00001666666667 = 0.0000166667 mL/s
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000166667 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.00001666666667 = 0.001 mL/s
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.001 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.0000016667 mL/s |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.0000166667 mL/s |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.0001666667 mL/s |
| 60 mm3/min | 0.001 mL/s |
| 100 mm3/min | 0.0016666667 mL/s |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 0.0166666667 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.0000166667 mL/s × 60000 = 1.000002 mm3/min
0.0000166667 milliliter per seconds = 1.000002 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = milliliter per seconds × 60000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0000166667 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.00001666666667. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 60,000 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001666666667 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.