Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Quart per Weeks Converter — mm3/min to qt/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0106514172 quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 1.56473701e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Quart per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quart per weeks = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0106514171511
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 quart per weeks equals 1.564737e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-quart per weeks factor of 0.0106514171511.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.01065141715 = 0.0106514172 qt/wk
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0106514172 quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.01065141715 = 0.6390850291 qt/wk
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.6390850291 quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 0.0010651417 qt/wk |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.0106514172 qt/wk |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.1065141715 qt/wk |
| 60 mm3/min | 0.6390850291 qt/wk |
| 100 mm3/min | 1.065141715 qt/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 10.65141715 qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.0106514172 qt/wk × 93.88422083 = 1.000000005 mm3/min
0.0106514172 quart per weeks = 1.000000005 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = quart per weeks × 93.8842208333
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quart per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0106514172 quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to quart per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.01065141715. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per weeks back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per weeks equals 93.88422083 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per weeks?
Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01065141715 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.