Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Hours Converter — mm3/s to bu/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) to Bushel per Hours (bu/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.0001021593 bushel per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-9 / 9.7886306e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds and Bushel per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per hours = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.00010215933573
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, and 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per seconds-to-bushel per hours factor of 0.00010215933573.
Simple example
1 mm3/s × 0.0001021593357 = 0.0001021593 bu/h
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.0001021593 bushel per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/s × 0.0001021593357 = 0.0061295601 bu/h
60 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.0061295601 bushel per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) | Bushel per Hours (bu/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/s | 0.0000102159 bu/h |
| 1 mm3/s | 0.0001021593 bu/h |
| 10 mm3/s | 0.0010215934 bu/h |
| 60 mm3/s | 0.0061295601 bu/h |
| 100 mm3/s | 0.0102159336 bu/h |
| 1,000 mm3/s | 0.1021593357 bu/h |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
0.0001021593 bu/h × 9788.630602 = 0.9999996502 mm3/s
0.0001021593 bushel per hours = 0.9999996502 cubic millimeter per seconds.
cubic millimeter per seconds = bushel per hours × 9788.63060191
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per seconds?
1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.0001021593 bushel per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds to bushel per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per seconds value by 0.0001021593357. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per hours back to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per hours equals 9,788.630602 cubic millimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per seconds to bushel per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per seconds and bushel per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0001021593357 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.