Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — mm3/s to bu/ms
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 2.837759e-11 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-9 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = cubic millimeter per seconds × 2.837759e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per seconds-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 2.837759e-11.
Simple example
1 mm3/s × 2.837759e-11 = 2.837759e-11 bu/ms
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 2.837759e-11 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mm3/s × 2.837759e-11 = 1.702656e-9 bu/ms
60 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1.702656e-9 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/s | 2.837759e-12 bu/ms |
| 1 mm3/s | 2.837759e-11 bu/ms |
| 10 mm3/s | 2.837759e-10 bu/ms |
| 60 mm3/s | 1.702656e-9 bu/ms |
| 100 mm3/s | 2.837759e-9 bu/ms |
| 1,000 mm3/s | 2.837759e-8 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
2.837759e-11 bu/ms × 35239070170 = 0.9999998852 mm3/s
2.837759e-11 bushels per millisecond = 0.9999998852 cubic millimeter per seconds.
cubic millimeter per seconds = bushels per millisecond × 35239070166.9
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 cubic millimeter per seconds?
1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 2.837759e-11 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per seconds value by 2.837759e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35,239,070,170 cubic millimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per seconds to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per seconds and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.837759e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.