Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — mm3/s to cm3/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 3.6 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-9 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = cubic millimeter per seconds × 3.6
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per seconds-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 3.6.
Simple example
1 mm3/s × 3.6 = 3.6 cm3/h
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 3.6 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/s × 3.6 = 216 cm3/h
60 cubic millimeter per seconds = 216 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/s | 0.36 cm3/h |
| 1 mm3/s | 3.6 cm3/h |
| 10 mm3/s | 36 cm3/h |
| 60 mm3/s | 216 cm3/h |
| 100 mm3/s | 360 cm3/h |
| 1,000 mm3/s | 3,600 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
3.6 cm3/h × 0.2777777778 = 1 mm3/s
3.6 cubic centimeter per hours = 1 cubic millimeter per seconds.
cubic millimeter per seconds = cubic centimeter per hours × 0.277777777778
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per seconds?
1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 3.6 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per seconds value by 3.6. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 0.2777777778 cubic millimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per seconds to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per seconds and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.6 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.