Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Decaliter per Minutes Converter — mm3/s to daL/min
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) to Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.000006 decaliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Decaliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-9 / 0.0001666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Decaliter per Minutes
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds and Decaliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
decaliter per minutes = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.000006
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, and 1 decaliter per minutes equals 0.000166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per seconds-to-decaliter per minutes factor of 0.000006.
Simple example
1 mm3/s × 0.000006 = 0.000006 daL/min
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.000006 decaliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mm3/s × 0.000006 = 0.00036 daL/min
60 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.00036 decaliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) | Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/s | 6e-7 daL/min |
| 1 mm3/s | 0.000006 daL/min |
| 10 mm3/s | 0.00006 daL/min |
| 60 mm3/s | 0.00036 daL/min |
| 100 mm3/s | 0.0006 daL/min |
| 1,000 mm3/s | 0.006 daL/min |
Reverse conversion: Decaliter per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
0.000006 daL/min × 166666.6667 = 1 mm3/s
0.000006 decaliter per minutes = 1 cubic millimeter per seconds.
cubic millimeter per seconds = decaliter per minutes × 166666.666667
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Decaliter per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many decaliter per minutes are in 1 cubic millimeter per seconds?
1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.000006 decaliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds to decaliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per seconds value by 0.000006. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert decaliter per minutes back to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 decaliter per minutes equals 166,666.6667 cubic millimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a decaliter per minutes?
Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per seconds to decaliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per seconds and decaliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000006 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.