Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Hours Converter — mm3/s to fl oz/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) to Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.1217304817 fluid ounce per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-9 / 8.21486932e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds and Fluid ounce per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per hours = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.121730481727
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per hours equals 8.214869e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per seconds-to-fluid ounce per hours factor of 0.121730481727.
Simple example
1 mm3/s × 0.1217304817 = 0.1217304817 fl oz/h
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.1217304817 fluid ounce per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/s × 0.1217304817 = 7.303828904 fl oz/h
60 cubic millimeter per seconds = 7.303828904 fluid ounce per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) | Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/s | 0.0121730482 fl oz/h |
| 1 mm3/s | 0.1217304817 fl oz/h |
| 10 mm3/s | 1.217304817 fl oz/h |
| 60 mm3/s | 7.303828904 fl oz/h |
| 100 mm3/s | 12.17304817 fl oz/h |
| 1,000 mm3/s | 121.7304817 fl oz/h |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
0.1217304817 fl oz/h × 8.214869323 = 0.9999999998 mm3/s
0.1217304817 fluid ounce per hours = 0.9999999998 cubic millimeter per seconds.
cubic millimeter per seconds = fluid ounce per hours × 8.21486932292
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per seconds?
1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.1217304817 fluid ounce per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds to fluid ounce per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per seconds value by 0.1217304817. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per hours back to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per hours equals 8.214869323 cubic millimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per hours?
Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per seconds to fluid ounce per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per seconds and fluid ounce per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1217304817 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.