Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Teaspoon per Weeks Converter — mm3/s to tsp/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) to Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 122.7043256 teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-9 / 8.14967195e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Teaspoon per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds and Teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoon per weeks = cubic millimeter per seconds × 122.70432558
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, and 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per seconds-to-teaspoon per weeks factor of 122.70432558.
Simple example
1 mm3/s × 122.7043256 = 122.7043256 tsp/wk
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 122.7043256 teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/s × 122.7043256 = 7,362.259535 tsp/wk
60 cubic millimeter per seconds = 7,362.259535 teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) | Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/s | 12.27043256 tsp/wk |
| 1 mm3/s | 122.7043256 tsp/wk |
| 10 mm3/s | 1,227.043256 tsp/wk |
| 60 mm3/s | 7,362.259535 tsp/wk |
| 100 mm3/s | 12,270.43256 tsp/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/s | 122,704.3256 tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
122.7043256 tsp/wk × 0.008149671947 = 1 mm3/s
122.7043256 teaspoon per weeks = 1 cubic millimeter per seconds.
cubic millimeter per seconds = teaspoon per weeks × 0.00814967194734
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoon per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per seconds?
1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 122.7043256 teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds to teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per seconds value by 122.7043256. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks back to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 0.0081496719 cubic millimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per seconds to teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per seconds and teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 122.7043256 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.