Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Centiliter per Hours Converter — mm3/wk to cL/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 5.952381e-7 centiliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Centiliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 2.77777778e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Centiliter per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Centiliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per hours = cubic millimeter per weeks × 5.952381e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-centiliter per hours factor of 5.952381e-7.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 5.952381e-7 = 5.952381e-7 cL/h
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 5.952381e-7 centiliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 5.952381e-7 = 0.0000357143 cL/h
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0000357143 centiliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 5.952381e-8 cL/h |
| 1 mm3/wk | 5.952381e-7 cL/h |
| 10 mm3/wk | 0.0000059524 cL/h |
| 60 mm3/wk | 0.0000357143 cL/h |
| 100 mm3/wk | 0.0000595238 cL/h |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.0005952381 cL/h |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
5.952381e-7 cL/h × 1680000 = 1.000000008 mm3/wk
5.952381e-7 centiliter per hours = 1.000000008 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = centiliter per hours × 1680000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 5.952381e-7 centiliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to centiliter per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 5.952381e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per hours back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per hours equals 1,680,000 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to centiliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and centiliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.952381e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.