Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — mm3/wk to cm3/s
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 1.653439e-9 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = cubic millimeter per weeks × 1.653439e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 1.653439e-9.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 1.653439e-9 = 1.653439e-9 cm3/s
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 1.653439e-9 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 1.653439e-9 = 9.920635e-8 cm3/s
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 9.920635e-8 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 1.653439e-10 cm3/s |
| 1 mm3/wk | 1.653439e-9 cm3/s |
| 10 mm3/wk | 1.653439e-8 cm3/s |
| 60 mm3/wk | 9.920635e-8 cm3/s |
| 100 mm3/wk | 1.653439e-7 cm3/s |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.0000016534 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
1.653439e-9 cm3/s × 604800000 = 0.9999999072 mm3/wk
1.653439e-9 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.9999999072 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 604800000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-9 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 1.653439e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 604,800,000 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.653439e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.