Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Minutes Converter — mm3/wk to in3/min
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 6.053943e-9 cubic inch per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 2.73117733e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Minutes
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Cubic inch per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per minutes = cubic millimeter per weeks × 6.053943e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 2.731177e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-cubic inch per minutes factor of 6.053943e-9.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 6.053943e-9 = 6.053943e-9 in3/min
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 6.053943e-9 cubic inch per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 6.053943e-9 = 3.632366e-7 in3/min
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 3.632366e-7 cubic inch per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 6.053943e-10 in3/min |
| 1 mm3/wk | 6.053943e-9 in3/min |
| 10 mm3/wk | 6.053943e-8 in3/min |
| 60 mm3/wk | 3.632366e-7 in3/min |
| 100 mm3/wk | 6.053943e-7 in3/min |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.0000060539 in3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
6.053943e-9 in3/min × 165181605.1 = 1.000000022 mm3/wk
6.053943e-9 cubic inch per minutes = 1.000000022 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = cubic inch per minutes × 165181605.12
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per minutes are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 6.053943e-9 cubic inch per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to cubic inch per minutes?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 6.053943e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per minutes back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 165,181,605.1 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per minutes?
Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to cubic inch per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and cubic inch per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6.053943e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.