Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Weeks Converter — mm3/wk to in3/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0000610237 cubic inch per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 2.70950132e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Cubic inch per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per weeks = cubic millimeter per weeks × 0.0000610237440947
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2.709501e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-cubic inch per weeks factor of 0.0000610237440947.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 0.00006102374409 = 0.0000610237 in3/wk
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0000610237 cubic inch per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 0.00006102374409 = 0.0036614246 in3/wk
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0036614246 cubic inch per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 0.0000061024 in3/wk |
| 1 mm3/wk | 0.0000610237 in3/wk |
| 10 mm3/wk | 0.0006102374 in3/wk |
| 60 mm3/wk | 0.0036614246 in3/wk |
| 100 mm3/wk | 0.0061023744 in3/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.0610237441 in3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
0.0000610237 in3/wk × 16387.064 = 0.9999992774 mm3/wk
0.0000610237 cubic inch per weeks = 0.9999992774 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = cubic inch per weeks × 16387.064
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 0.0000610237 cubic inch per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to cubic inch per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 0.00006102374409. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per weeks back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 16,387.064 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per weeks?
Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to cubic inch per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and cubic inch per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00006102374409 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.