Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Days Converter — mm3/wk to fl oz/d
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0000048306 fluid ounce per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 3.42286222e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Days
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Fluid ounce per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per days = cubic millimeter per weeks × 0.00000483057467169
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per days equals 3.422862e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-fluid ounce per days factor of 0.00000483057467169.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 0.000004830574672 = 0.0000048306 fl oz/d
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0000048306 fluid ounce per days.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 0.000004830574672 = 0.0002898345 fl oz/d
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0002898345 fluid ounce per days.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 4.830575e-7 fl oz/d |
| 1 mm3/wk | 0.0000048306 fl oz/d |
| 10 mm3/wk | 0.0000483057 fl oz/d |
| 60 mm3/wk | 0.0002898345 fl oz/d |
| 100 mm3/wk | 0.0004830575 fl oz/d |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.0048305747 fl oz/d |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Days to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
0.0000048306 fl oz/d × 207014.7069 = 1.000005243 mm3/wk
0.0000048306 fluid ounce per days = 1.000005243 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = fluid ounce per days × 207014.706938
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Days to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per days are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 0.0000048306 fluid ounce per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to fluid ounce per days?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 0.000004830574672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per days back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per days equals 207,014.7069 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per days?
Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to fluid ounce per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and fluid ounce per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000004830574672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.