Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Kiloliter per Minutes Converter — mm3/wk to kL/min
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 9.920635e-14 kiloliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Kiloliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 0.01666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Kiloliter per Minutes
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Kiloliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
kiloliter per minutes = cubic millimeter per weeks × 9.920635e-14
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 kiloliter per minutes equals 0.0166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-kiloliter per minutes factor of 9.920635e-14.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 9.920635e-14 = 9.920635e-14 kL/min
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 9.920635e-14 kiloliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 9.920635e-14 = 5.952381e-12 kL/min
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 5.952381e-12 kiloliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 9.920635e-15 kL/min |
| 1 mm3/wk | 9.920635e-14 kL/min |
| 10 mm3/wk | 9.920635e-13 kL/min |
| 60 mm3/wk | 5.952381e-12 kL/min |
| 100 mm3/wk | 9.920635e-12 kL/min |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 9.920635e-11 kL/min |
Reverse conversion: Kiloliter per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
9.920635e-14 kL/min × 1.008e+13 = 1.000000008 mm3/wk
9.920635e-14 kiloliter per minutes = 1.000000008 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = kiloliter per minutes × 1.008e+13
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Kiloliter per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many kiloliter per minutes are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 9.920635e-14 kiloliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to kiloliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 9.920635e-14. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert kiloliter per minutes back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 kiloliter per minutes equals 1.008e+13 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a kiloliter per minutes?
Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to kiloliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and kiloliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 9.920635e-14 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.