Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Days Converter — mm3/wk to mL/d
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Milliliter per Days (mL/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0001428571 milliliter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 1.15740741e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Days
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Milliliter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per days = cubic millimeter per weeks × 0.000142857142857
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 milliliter per days equals 1.157407e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-milliliter per days factor of 0.000142857142857.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 0.0001428571429 = 0.0001428571 mL/d
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0001428571 milliliter per days.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 0.0001428571429 = 0.0085714286 mL/d
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0085714286 milliliter per days.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Milliliter per Days (mL/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 0.0000142857 mL/d |
| 1 mm3/wk | 0.0001428571 mL/d |
| 10 mm3/wk | 0.0014285714 mL/d |
| 60 mm3/wk | 0.0085714286 mL/d |
| 100 mm3/wk | 0.0142857143 mL/d |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.1428571429 mL/d |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Days to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
0.0001428571 mL/d × 7000 = 0.9999997 mm3/wk
0.0001428571 milliliter per days = 0.9999997 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = milliliter per days × 7000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Days to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Days (mL/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per days are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 0.0001428571 milliliter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to milliliter per days?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 0.0001428571429. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per days back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per days equals 7,000 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per days?
Milliliter per Days (mL/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to milliliter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and milliliter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0001428571429 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.