Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours Converter — mm3/wk to mL/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0000059524 milliliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Milliliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per hours = cubic millimeter per weeks × 0.00000595238095238
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 milliliter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-milliliter per hours factor of 0.00000595238095238.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 0.000005952380952 = 0.0000059524 mL/h
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0000059524 milliliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 0.000005952380952 = 0.0003571429 mL/h
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0003571429 milliliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 5.952381e-7 mL/h |
| 1 mm3/wk | 0.0000059524 mL/h |
| 10 mm3/wk | 0.0000595238 mL/h |
| 60 mm3/wk | 0.0003571429 mL/h |
| 100 mm3/wk | 0.0005952381 mL/h |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.005952381 mL/h |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
0.0000059524 mL/h × 168000 = 1.0000032 mm3/wk
0.0000059524 milliliter per hours = 1.0000032 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = milliliter per hours × 168000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 0.0000059524 milliliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to milliliter per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 0.000005952380952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per hours back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per hours equals 168,000 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per hours?
Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to milliliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and milliliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000005952380952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.