Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — mm3/wk to imp qt/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 5.237363e-9 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = cubic millimeter per weeks × 5.237363e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 5.237363e-9.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 5.237363e-9 = 5.237363e-9 imp qt/h
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 5.237363e-9 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 5.237363e-9 = 3.142418e-7 imp qt/h
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 3.142418e-7 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 5.237363e-10 imp qt/h |
| 1 mm3/wk | 5.237363e-9 imp qt/h |
| 10 mm3/wk | 5.237363e-8 imp qt/h |
| 60 mm3/wk | 3.142418e-7 imp qt/h |
| 100 mm3/wk | 5.237363e-7 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.0000052374 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
5.237363e-9 imp qt/h × 190935780 = 0.9999999895 mm3/wk
5.237363e-9 imperial quart per hours = 0.9999999895 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 190935780
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 5.237363e-9 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 5.237363e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 190,935,780 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.237363e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.