Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Weeks Converter — mm3/wk to tsp/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) to Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0002028841 teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-15 / 8.14967195e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks and Teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoon per weeks = cubic millimeter per weeks × 0.000202884136211
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, and 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per weeks-to-teaspoon per weeks factor of 0.000202884136211.
Simple example
1 mm3/wk × 0.0002028841362 = 0.0002028841 tsp/wk
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0002028841 teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/wk × 0.0002028841362 = 0.0121730482 tsp/wk
60 cubic millimeter per weeks = 0.0121730482 teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) | Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/wk | 0.0000202884 tsp/wk |
| 1 mm3/wk | 0.0002028841 tsp/wk |
| 10 mm3/wk | 0.0020288414 tsp/wk |
| 60 mm3/wk | 0.0121730482 tsp/wk |
| 100 mm3/wk | 0.0202884136 tsp/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/wk | 0.2028841362 tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
0.0002028841 tsp/wk × 4928.921594 = 0.9999998215 mm3/wk
0.0002028841 teaspoon per weeks = 0.9999998215 cubic millimeter per weeks.
cubic millimeter per weeks = teaspoon per weeks × 4928.92159375
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoon per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per weeks?
1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 0.0002028841 teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks to teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per weeks value by 0.0002028841362. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks back to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 4,928.921594 cubic millimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per weeks to teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per weeks and teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0002028841362 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.