Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Years to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — mm3/yr to mL/s
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per years = 3.168874e-11 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Years to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-17 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Years to Milliliter per Seconds
Cubic Millimeter per Years and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = cubic millimeter per years × 3.168874e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per years equals 3.168874e-17 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per years-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 3.168874e-11.
Simple example
1 mm3/yr × 3.168874e-11 = 3.168874e-11 mL/s
1 cubic millimeter per years = 3.168874e-11 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mm3/yr × 3.168874e-11 = 1.901324e-9 mL/s
60 cubic millimeter per years = 1.901324e-9 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/yr | 3.168874e-12 mL/s |
| 1 mm3/yr | 3.168874e-11 mL/s |
| 10 mm3/yr | 3.168874e-10 mL/s |
| 60 mm3/yr | 1.901324e-9 mL/s |
| 100 mm3/yr | 3.168874e-9 mL/s |
| 1,000 mm3/yr | 3.168874e-8 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Years
3.168874e-11 mL/s × 31556952000 = 1.000000047 mm3/yr
3.168874e-11 milliliter per seconds = 1.000000047 cubic millimeter per years.
cubic millimeter per years = milliliter per seconds × 31556952000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Years.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 cubic millimeter per years?
1 cubic millimeter per years equals 3.168874e-11 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per years to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per years value by 3.168874e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to cubic millimeter per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 31,556,952,000 cubic millimeter per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per years?
Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per years to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per years and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.168874e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.